Geochronometers and radio carbon dating Meet just for fuck

In various previous articles I have discussed specific Geochronometers which scientifically show that our earth, solar system, galaxy and universe are young, perfectly consistent with 6,000 years.

The reason that I have gone to such great lengths about this subject is simple.

There is no independent natural clock against which those assumptions can be tested.

For example, the amount of cratering on the moon, based on currently observed cratering rates, would suggest that the moon is quite old.

No scientific method can prove the age of the universe or the earth, and that includes the ones we have listed here.

Although age indicators are called "clocks" they aren't, because all ages result from calculations that necessarily involve making assumptions about the past.

If the earth were old, it would not make evolution true.

In the few cases where reputable peer-reviewed scientific papers are cited, their content is severely misrepresented or incorrectly interpreted.

Ultimately, the article seeks to persuade by force of numbers, rather than force of argument.

Always the starting time of the ‘clock’ has to be assumed as well as the way in which the speed of the clock has varied over time.

Further, it has to be assumed that the clock was never disturbed.

Leave a Reply